CNN BREAKING NEWS
Bush, Blair Hold News Conference
Aired April 6, 2002 - 11:58 ET
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.
FREDRICKA WHITFIELD, CNN ANCHOR: Within moments we're going to be taking you live to Crawford, Texas and that's where President Bush is spending the weekend. He is also spending the weekend there with British Prime Minister Tony Blair.
Within moments, Blair and Mr. Bush are likely to emerge to address reporters there, talking about their talks this morning in a CIA closed-door, top secret meeting. At the centerpiece of their discussions today, have of course been the Middle East. There you see President Bush and Prime Minister Tony Blair. We go to them now.
GEORGE W. BUSH, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES: Good morning. Laura and I are very honored to have our friends, Tony and Cherie Blair, and their family visit us here in Crawford. We appreciate the rain that the prime minister brought with him.
And so do the other farmers and ranchers in the area. So, Prime Minister, thanks for bringing it.
TONY BLAIR, PRIME MINISTER OF BRITAIN: My pleasure, George.
BUSH: It is always a pleasure for any American president to welcome the prime minister of Great Britain because ours in a special and unique relationship. And our relationship is strong because of my respect for the prime minister. I appreciate his advice, I appreciate his counsel, and I appreciate his friendship.
This morning, I conveyed to the prime minister the condolences of the American people for the recent passing if Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother. This remarkable woman is warmly remembered on both sides of the Atlantic for her grace and her strength, and particularly for her inspiration she provided during the darkest days of World War II. Today the bond between our peoples that she symbolized is stronger than ever.
Our nations share more than just a common language and a common history; we also share common interests and a common perspective on the important challenges of our time. No nation has been stronger in fighting global terrorism than Great Britain. I'm extremely grateful for the prime minister's courageous leadership since September the 11th. And the world is grateful for all the Great Britain has contributed in the war against terror -- everything from special forces to ground forces to naval forces to peacekeepers.
The prime minister and I both understand that defeating global terror requires a broad-based, long-term strategy. We understand the importance of denying terrorists weapons of mass destruction. And we understand the importance of adapting NATO to meet new threats, even as NATO prepares to take on new members and forges a new relationship with Russia.
The prime minister and I also agreed that, even as we work to make the world safer, we must also work to make the world better. Our countries will continue to work closely to bring greater hope and opportunity to developing nations.
We also had extensive conversations about the situation in the Middle East. Both our nations are strongly committed to finding a just settlement. Both of us agree on the fundamental elements that a just settlement must include. We share a vision of two states, Israel and Palestine, living side by side in peace and in security.
We agree that this vision will never be realized through terrorism and that it can only be realized through a political process. We agree that the Palestinian leadership must order an immediate and effective cease-fire and crackdown on terrorist networks. And we agree that Israel should halt incursions in the Palestinian-controlled areas and begin to withdraw without delay from those cities it has recently occupied.
The prime minister and I agreed to work closely in the weeks and months ahead on these difficult issues.
We have a common reading of history. We understand that each of our nations stands taller when we stand together. And that's why our nations will continue to stand together against freedom's enemies. And that's why we will continue to work together for not only the good of our own people, but for good of peace in the world.
Mr. Prime Minister?
BLAIR: Thank you, Mr. President.
First of all, if I could begin by thanking you and the first lady for the very kind and gracious welcome that you have given to myself and my family. And also thank the people of Crawford and McLennan County for their kind welcome too. And it's a real pleasure to be with you here.
And as you might expect, we've had very detailed discussions covering all of the issues from the topics of the moment through to issues like trade and bilateral issues between us. Of course, much of our discussion has focused on the situation in the Middle East. And I agree entirely with what the president said just a moment or two ago, not just in relation to what must happen in the immediate term, but also as to the only basis upon which there will be and can be a viable and lasting peace there. And that is a state of Israel, secure in its own borders, recognized by the entirety of the Arab world, and also a viable Palestinian state where people can live side by side with each other.
We discussed, of course, the issues of international terrorism and weapons of mass destruction.
I would like to pay a particular tribute to the president for his courage and for his leadership in the aftermath of the 11th of September. And I think that it is worth reflecting that, over these past few months, although very much still remains to be done, we have accomplished, nonetheless, a very great deal in Afghanistan and in the pursuit of those responsible for that terrible event on the 11th of September.
And we will continue to work in any way we can in order to make sure that this scourge of international terrorism is defeated.
We also agreed to make it very clear, as well, that the issue of weapons of mass destruction cannot be doubted. It is a threat; it is a danger to our world. And we must heed that threat and act to prevent it being realized.
In addition, I was grateful for the president's kind words about the contribution Britain has made in Afghanistan. We make that willingly because we believe it is important, not just that we rout out the last remnants of the Al Qaeda terrorist network in Afghanistan, but also that we help that country to go from being a failed state, failing its region and its people, to a state that offers some hope of stability and prosperity for the future.
And finally, I would like to say a special thank you to the president for his words on Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother. That would be deeply appreciated by people of Britain. And as you may know, there have been many Americans, as well as British people, paying their respects to the Queen Mother as she lies in state.
Ours is, indeed, a very special and unique relationship between Britain and the United States of America. And I have no doubt at all that, under the leadership of President Bush, that relationship will strengthen, still further. And for that, Britain is glad; I know that the United States is. But I believe it is good for the wider world, too.
BUSH: We have now agreed to take three question apiece, and we'll start with Ron Fournier, a fine man who works for AP.
Got a couple of kids, cares deeply about the future.
BLAIR: I'm just thinking of how I introduce mine now.
BUSH: I've noticed.
QUESTION: Israel is moving deeper into Palestinian territories, and there's reports today that she has launched attacks on southern Lebanon.
Have you failed, Mr. President, to convince Prime Minister Sharon to pull back his troops? And why did you wait so long to demand a withdraw and only today adding the caveat "without delay"?
BUSH: My administration's -- my words to Israel are the same today as they were a couple of days ago: Withdraw without delay.
I made the decision to give the speech when I did because I was concerned about the ability for those of us who were interested in a long-term solution to take hold.
I was worried about the balance being tipped to the point where we weren't able to achieve a long-lasting peace.
I gave the speech at the right time.
And I expect Israel to heed my advice, and I expect for the Palestinians to reject terror. And the Arab world, as Israel steps back, we expect the Arab world to step up and lead, to lead against terror, to get into an immediate cease-fire, to begin the implementation of U.N. Resolution 1042.
QUESTION: Can I follow up briefly?
BUSH: No. Nice try.
BLAIR: Andy Meyer (ph), who works for the BBC and really nothing else (inaudible) said...
QUESTION: I've got three children.
Could I just follow up from that and ask the president and prime minister, what happens now if the Israelis continue to ignore what you have been asking them to do?
BUSH: I don't expect them to ignore. I expect them to heed the call, heed the call from their friends the United States, and heed the call from their friends, the Great -- the people of Great Britain and the leadership of Great Britain.
QUESTION: But if they don't?
BUSH: Well, that's -- as I told you, I think they will heed the call.
BLAIR: I think that most people in Israel will realize that they don't have two greater friends in the world than the United States of America or Britain. And we both understand, as well, the appalling nature of the acts of terrorism that they have been subject to. We understand that.
But we are also trying to help secure a way out of the present impasse so that we can get into a political process where some of these underlying issues can be resolved satisfactorily for the long term.
Because the bloodshed and the carnage and innocent people dying, in the end, is not a solution to this issue.
So I believe that Israel will heed the words of President Bush, and will do so knowing that he speaks as a friend to Israel.
QUESTION: Mr. President, you have yet to build an international coalition for military action against Iraq. Has the violence in the Middle East thwarted your efforts?
And Prime Minister Blair, has Bush convinced you on the need for military action against Iraq?
BUSH: The Prime Minister and I of course talked about Iraq. We both recognize the danger of a man who's willing to kill his own people harboring and developing weapons of mass destruction. This guy, Saddam Hussein, is a leader who gases his own people, goes after people in his own neighborhood with chemical weapons.
He's a man who obviously has something to hide. He told the world that he would show us that he would not develop weapons of mass destruction, and yet, over the past decade, he's refused to do so.
And the prime minister and I both agree that he needs to prove that he isn't developing weapons of mass destruction.
I explained to the prime minister that, you know, that the policy of my government is the removal of Saddam, and that all options are on the table.
BLAIR: If I can say that any sensible person looking at the position of Saddam Hussein and asking the question, would the region, the world and, not least, the ordinary Iraqi people, be better off without the regime of Saddam Hussein, the only answer anyone could give to that question would be yes.
Now, how we approach this, this is a matter for discussion. This is a matter for considering all the options. But a situation where he continues to be in breach of all the United Nations resolutions, refusing to allow us to assess, as the international community have demanded, whether and how he is developing these weapons of mass destruction, doing nothing in those circumstances is not an option. So we consider all the options available.
But the president is right to draw attention to the threat of weapons of mass destruction. That threat is real. How we deal with it, that's a matter we discuss. But that the threat exists and that we have to deal with it, that seems to me a matter of plain common sense.
QUESTION: Prime Minister, we've heard the president say what his policy is directly about Saddam Hussein, which is to remove him. That is the policy of the American administration. Could I ask you whether that is now the policy of the British government?
And could I ask you both, if it is now your policy to target Saddam Hussein, what has happened to the doctrine of not targeting heads of state and leaving countries to decide who their leaders should be, which is one of the principles which applied during the Gulf War?
BLAIR: Well, you know, it has always been our policy that Iraq would be a better place without Saddam Hussein. I don't think anyone could be in any doubt about that for all of the reasons I gave earlier. And, you know, reasons to do with weapons of mass destruction also do with the appalling brutality and repression of his own people.
But how we now proceed in this situation, how we make sure that this threat that is posed by weapons of mass destruction is dealt with, that is a matter that is open. And when the time comes for taking those decisions, we will tell people about those decisions.
But you cannot have a situation in which he carries on in being in breach of the U.N. resolutions and refusing to allow us the capability of assessing how that weapons-of-mass-destruction capability is being advanced, even though the international community has made it absolutely clear that he should do so.
Now, as to say how we then proceed from there, that is a matter that is open for us.
BUSH: Maybe I should be a little less direct and be a little more nuanced and say we support regime change.
QUESTION: That's a change, though, isn't it, a change in policy?
BUSH: No, it's really not. Regime change was the policy of my predecessor, as well.
QUESTION: And your father?
BUSH: You know, I can't remember that far back, but...
BUSH: ... it's certainly the policy of my administration. And I think "regime change" sounds a lot more civil, doesn't it? Yes. The world would be better off without him -- let me put it that way, though -- and so will the future.
See, the worst thing that can happen is to allow this man to abrogate his promise and hook up with a terrorist network. And then, all of sudden, you got one of these shadowy terrorist networks that have got an arsenal at their disposal, which could create a situation in which the nations down the road get blackmailed. We can't let it happen. We just can't let it happen.
And obviously, the prime minister is somebody who understands this clearly, and that's why I appreciate dealing with him on the issue. And we've got close consultations going on. We talk about it all the time. And he's got very good advice on the subject, and I appreciate that.
QUESTION: You say that in the war against terrorism, people are either with us or against us. Whose side is Chairman Arafat on, and do you think the world would be a better place without him?
BUSH: I think Chairman Arafat -- I was asked on British TV the other day, have I lost trust in Chairman Arafat, and I said, "Well, he's never earned my trust," because he hasn't performed.
Somebody told me there's a story floating around that somehow I am blaming the Clinton administration for what's going on in the Middle East right now.
Let's make this very clear, that in my speech I said that Mr. Arafat has not lived up to the promises that he made at Oslo and elsewhere to fight off terror. He hasn't performed.
I appreciate what President Clinton tried to do. He tried to bring peace to the Middle East. I'm going to try to bring peace to the Middle East. But in order to earn my trust, somebody must keep their word. And Chairman Arafat has not kept his word. He said he would fight off terror, and he hasn't.
He needs to speak clearly, in Arabic, to the people of that region and condemn terrorist activities. At the very minimum, he ought to at least say something.
And, you know, there's all kinds of excuses. Look, in order to achieve lasting peace, both sides must make constructive steps. And we are prepared to help and will help. That's why the secretary of state is going to the region.
But Chairman Arafat has failed in his leadership, and he's let the people down. He had opportunity after opportunity to be a leader, and he hasn't led, and I'm disappointed.
QUESTION: Present company doubtless excepted, I mean, one could think of quite a lot of world leaders the world might be better off without.
BUSH: Thank you for the exception.
QUESTION: And I'm not sure necessarily whether the prime minister would agree with you on Yasser Arafat. But can I ask you -- I think what Europeans have a problem with about expanding any war on terror to Iraq is linkage. They can see a linkage between Al Qaeda and Afghanistan. They can't see a direct linkage to Saddam Hussein.
Would you accept that there isn't a direct linkage? And how, therefore...
BUSH: Well, first of all, I wouldn't accept that. But can't they see linkage between somebody who's willing to murder his own people and the danger of him possessing weapons of mass destruction which he said he would not develop?
I see the linkage between somebody who is willing to go into his own neighborhood and use chemical weapons in order to keep himself in power and, at the same time, develop a weapon that could be aimed at Europe, aimed at Israel, aimed anywhere, in order to affect foreign policy, through his -- you know, I can't imagine people not seeing the threat and not holding Saddam Hussein accountable for what he said he would do, and we're going to do that.
History has called us into action. The thing I admire about this prime minister is he didn't need a poll or a focus group to convince him the difference between right and wrong.
And it's refreshing to see leaders speak with moral clarity, when it comes to the defense of freedom. I intend to continue to speak with clarity when it comes to freedom, and I know Prime Minister Tony Blair does, as well.
And we are -- we will hold Saddam Hussein accountable for broken promises. And that's what a lot of our discussion over there in Prairie Chapel Ranch has been about. And other than eating lunch, which we're fixing to go do, we're going to continue our discussions.
BLAIR: Now, you talked about no linkage there. There is a reason why United Nations resolutions were passed, nine of them, calling upon him to stop developing weapons of mass destruction. I mean, there is a reason why weapons inspectors went in there, and that is because we know he has been developing these weapons. We know that those weapons constitute a threat.
Three days after the 11th of September, when I made my first statement to the House of Commons in Britain, I specifically said then, this issue of weapons of mass destruction has got to be dealt with.
And the reason for that is that what happened on the 11th of September was a call to us to make sure that we didn't repeat the mistake of allowing groups to develop destructive capability and hope that at some point in time they weren't going to use it. They develop that destructive capability for a reason. Now, we've made it very clear to you how we then proceed and how we deal with this. All of the options are open.
And I think after the 11th of September, this president showed that he proceeds in a calm and a measured and a sensible but in a firm way. Now, that is precisely what we need in this situation, too.
And as I say to you, never forget, he knows perfectly well what the international community has demanded of him over these past years, and he's never done it.
BUSH: Thank you all.
BLAIR: Thank you.
BUSH: Good job.
WHITFIELD: All right, you've been watching President Bush and British Prime Minister Tony Blair address reporters there from Crawford, Texas.
A few points being made. Number one, on the Middle East, President Bush underscored now, using stronger language, saying that Israel needs to withdraw without delay. And British Prime Minister Tony Blair in agreement there.
President Bush also challenged the Arab states, saying it's time for you all to step in and to lead as it pertains to the Palestinian violence that's ongoing. Bush said that he is "disappointed," quote- unquote, that Arafat has failed to lead his people.
And on the issue of Iraq, President Bush once again saying it is time that the leader Saddam Hussein be removed. And then he quickly corrected his language, saying that it would sound more civil to say that it was time for a regime change. British Prime Minister Tony Blair has also said that it is time for that regime change; but he said he's not willing to detail just quite yet how to do that, in part because, he says, they want to be in agreement with the U.N.
Now let's go to our Kelly Wallace who is in Crawford, Texas.
And you listened intently to the words of the president and the British prime minister.
KELLY WALLACE, CNN WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: We certainly did, Fredricka.
Picking up first on your last point about Iraq. Definitely interesting to listen to the two leaders, because the British prime minister is facing a lot of pressure back at home. A lot of lawmakers very concerned that Mr. Bush is planning some imminent military action against Iraq.
So if you looked at Mr. Blair's words, he chose them very carefully. He said all options on the table; we must deal with the threat of the weapons of mass destruction; how to deal with that threat is an open question. He said the president, though, is very cautious, very deliberative. Those are important words for Mr. Blair to convey to, again, to those critics back at home who are concerned about any imminent military action.
Of course, though, you did hear Mr. Bush talking quite strongly that he does believe Saddam Hussein must go.
And then Fredricka, picking up on your other point regarding the Middle East, of course we were looking to see what the president would say about the fact that the Israeli military offensive continues, even after Mr. Bush called for a halt and for withdrawal to begin on Thursday.
And I think you're exactly right, the president very, very forceful, very passionate, saying that it is time for that withdrawal without delay. And when pressed about the consequences if Israel does not respond to the president's words and demands, well, the president saying he expects Israel to heed his call and his advice.
So a lot of attention will be paid to see if Israel does respond. But I think it's clear to say the president was very forceful in conveying that message.
And also on Mr. Arafat, as you said, very, very tough talk indeed. Saying that Chairman Arafat has been a failure, in essence; not doing enough, not leading his people. We are really seeing this administration increase the pressure over and over again on Mr. Arafat. And starting to say that Mr. Bush, Secretary of State Colin Powell, Arab leaders will be engaging, potentially, even, with other leaders within the Palestinian community if Mr. Arafat does not pull through -- Fredricka.
WHITFIELD:: All right, thanks very much Kelly Wallace, traveling with the president, spending the weekend in Crawford, Texas with the president of the United States and the British prime minister. Thank you.
Now for some immediate reaction, particularly from a representative of an Arab state -- from Jordan, more specifically, given that President Bush made a challenge to Arab states to step in and to lead as it pertains to helping to end the Palestinian side of the violence.
From New York, Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein. He is joining us now; the Jordanian ambassador to the U.N.
Thanks for joining us.
ZEID RA'AD ZEID AL-HUSSEIN, JORDANIAN AMB. TO U.N.: Thank you Fredricka.
WHITFIELD: All right. Well, you listened intently as well to the president's remarks, as well as the British prime minister. President Bush making it very clear that it is his belief that the Arab states -- the surrounding Arab states need to step in, in his words, and take the lead. What's your response to that?
AL-HUSSEIN: Well, I believe that President Arafat has not wasted an occasion in condemning the actions perpetrated against Israeli civilians. And indeed, this is a position that has been articulated by all Arab governments, I believe.
Only 10 days ago during our discussions in the Security Council prior to the passage of resolution 1402, I, representing the Arab group at the U.N., condemned these actions in Arabic. And so I am rather perplexed to hear that President Bush and perhaps Prime Minister Blair have not heard these remarks.
We utterly condemn actions against all civilians, and that we have made clear on more than one occasion.
WHITFIELD: Is it convincing to you that President Bush would try to use more stirring language as it pertains to the Israelis? He's got an awful lot of criticism in recent days that he was showing a bit more compassion for the Israeli military defense.
He said without delay, the Israeli pull-out must take place. Satisfactory enough for you?
AL-HUSSEIN: Yes. The term "without delay" is found in resolution 1403, which was adopted by the Security Council only two days ago.
And so this is the will of the international community. That resolution 1402, which calls for the withdraw of Israeli forces from all towns reoccupied by them over the course of the last week. And of course we welcome the president and the prime minister's strong remarks in this regard.
We believe it absolutely essential that the Israelis withdraw forthwith immediately from the Palestinian territories.
WHITFIELD: But that it hasn't happened -- some of your country representatives said as early as yesterday that it concerns them that the pull-out just may not take place in time for Secretary of State Powell's arrival scheduled for tomorrow.
AL-HUSSEIN: Yes, absolutely. I mean, this concerns all of us. We had hoped for an immediate and positive reaction from the Israeli government to President Bush's speech two days ago.
And of course we're viewing the situation with mounting concern. It is extremely grave, and carries with it potential negative consequences for the entire region.
WHITFIELD: How much does it concern you that the continued military siege of Ramallah, more specifically, will continue to erode the Palestinian authority there -- the infrastructure of that leadership?
AL-HUSSEIN: Well, I mean, it's of great concern, obviously. Were we to accept that the Israelis had a right to pursue those who have perpetrated attacks against them, it does not in any way give them the right to attack the entire Palestinian population either directly, through shelling and shooting, or indirectly through the severing of water supplies, humanitarian aid, medical attention to civilians in need.
And of course it's appalling, what we see occurring in the occupied territories, and it must come to an immediate end.
WHITFIELD: All right, Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al-Hussein, thanks very much for joining us from New York, Jordanian ambassador to the U.N.
TO ORDER A VIDEO OF THIS TRANSCRIPT, PLEASE CALL 800-CNN-NEWS OR USE OUR SECURE ONLINE ORDER FORM LOCATED AT www.fdch.com