Return to Transcripts main page


Secrecy at Penn State; Mother of Alleged Victim Speaks Out

Aired November 16, 2011 - 20:00   ET


ANDERSON COOPER, CNN ANCHOR: Erin, thanks very much. Good evening, everyone.

We begin tonight "Keeping Them Honest:" With new developments in the Penn State child sex abuse scandal.

More evidence that there's still much more to this story, still much more that people are covering up about what they knew and when they knew it.

You're also going to hear a mom's account of what her son is going through. He's the boy right now known simply as Victim 1 in that now notorious 23-page grand jury report detailing Jerry Sandusky's alleged 15-year string of serial abuse. Fifteen years.

He was the first to come forward, this boy was, three years ago. That's why he's called Victim number 1, though according to the grand jury he was not the fist victim. He started the landslide that brought down Sandusky, brought down head coach Joe Paterno, brought down Penn State's president, the senior vice president for finance and business, and the school's athletic director.

He's a brave kid, his mother says, but tonight he is afraid, afraid, she says, that people might find out who he is, afraid he might run into Jerry Sandusky, who's out on bail, afraid that Sandusky might -- might ultimately go free.

But that's not all she's saying tonight. She's also describing to us the pressure she faced from people who tried to get her not to go to police. Pressure from community members, from teachers she says, from people she trusted to put kids first and not defend Jerry Sandusky.

You're going to hear more of her story in just a moment from her own mouth.

Also tonight, John Walsh joins us from "America's Most Wanted".

First, though, the shifting account of this man, Penn State's wide receivers coach Michael McQueary, a graduate assistant back in 2002. And that's when he says he walked in on Jerry Sandusky raping a 10 or 11-year-old boy in the athletic building shower. According to the grand jury report, quote, "Went to his office and called his father, reporting to him what he'd seen," talking about McQueary. Then the next day, a Saturday, he told Joe Paterno. About a week and a half later, according to the grand jury report, McQueary was debriefed by athletic director Tim Curley and Gary Schultz, Penn State's senior vice president for finance and business. Schultz, by the way, also oversaw the University Police.

Now there's no mention in the 23-page report that McQueary ever contacted campus police or any law enforcement, nor is there any mention that he tried to stop the rape or protect the children. Yet now in an e-mail he sent former Penn State teammates, McQueary is claiming he did both.

Quote, "I did stop it," he writes. "Not physically but made sure it was stopped when I left that locker room." In the e-mail, which was obtained by Allentown's "Morning Call" newspaper, he goes on to claim, quote, "I did have discussions with police and with the official at the university in charge of police."

Yet not only is there no mention of that in the grand jury document, CNN contributor Sara Gannon reports that her newspaper, "The Patriot News," has seen a copy of McQueary's handwritten accounts of events which he made for police in connection with the grand jury investigation. She verified it with a source close to that investigation.

That handwritten account is consistent with the grand jury's report. In it McQueary makes no mention of intervening during the alleged rape or talking to any police officers in the days that follow. What's more, university spokesman tells "The Morning Call" they have no record of McQueary filing a police report at that time.

And that of course raises questions about his credibility. But it also raises much bigger credibility questions about top Penn State's officials and the university's lack of believability, lack of transparency and lack of accountability.

For starters, the judge with connections to Jerry Sandusky's charity, today she was dealt with, she was replaced. That's a pretty symbolic and frankly small step all things considered. Here's why. This is important. Now that we're 11 days into this story and some of the details might be getting hard to follow.

If the allegations against Sandusky are true, at least, at least seven children were sexually abuse after the first reported incident. Seven children since the first time university officials were told about it. And for reasons not entirely clear chose to look away.

Now we're going to keep asking questions on this until those reasons get clear.

Yesterday our Drew Griffin went looking for answers. He didn't get a lot of cooperation. He joins us now from State College.

Drew, what did you find out today?

DREW GRIFFIN, CNN SPECIAL INVESTIGATIONS UNIT CORRESPONDENT: You know, Anderson, yesterday we told you that -- about this exemption that Penn State has. They don't have to release documents which are usually public just about everywhere else in the United States of America.

So today we went looking for the people, those officials, who should have, would have and most likely did know about these allegations against Sandusky way back. The three officials in particular, former university president -- the former university president, Graham Spanier, the former university counsel, a guy by the name of Wendell Courtney, and the former police chief whose name is Tom Hartman.

Way back in 1998 these three people, according to the grand jury, most likely did know about the allegations that that mother was bringing forward, that Sandusky was showering naked with her son. And, in fact, a police investigation was launched but that former police chief decided, according to the grand jury report, to abruptly end the investigation.

We went looking for him today. He works at an architectural and engineering firm now, which has an office not far from where I am standing. This company does a lot of business with Penn State University. This is what happened when we went inside trying to find him.


GRIFFIN: Is Mr. Harmon in?


GRIFFIN: He's not in.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: He does not work in this office.

GRIFFIN: He works --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Go check his home.

GRIFFIN: -- out of his home.


GRIFFIN: All right. So does he have an office number? I mean, a number that if somebody at this office --

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: No. We can't provide that information. Sorry.

GRIFFIN: You can't provide that information?



GRIFFIN: Now via e-mail, Tom Harmon did eventually get back to us. This is what he said, not much, he just cannot discuss this matter citing an ongoing investigation. We did go to his home, by the way. Neighbors say, Anderson, he moved.

COOPER: Drew, did you also try to -- go to speak to the former legal counsel for Penn State who held that position during the 1998 investigation? Did you talk to him?

GRIFFIN: Tried. Wendell Courtney, a private lawyer now in town. He was university counsel in 1998 when these allegations surfaced. He actually gave a blessing for that initial investigation into Sandusky. Oddly enough, he went on to become the attorney for the Second Mile foundation, Jerry Sandusky's charity.

We did go to his office. We walked right through the front door, asked to see him. He was in but he wouldn't come out. Instead he sent an attorney out and that attorney basically told us to get off the property. They would not talk to us and just we also did try to talk to the current police chief. That was yesterday. And this is the current police chief of the university. Take a look at this.


GRIFFIN: Is the chief in?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I'm not sure. Turn the camera off.


GRIFFIN: Turn the camera off, right? We didn't turn the camera off. We sat there for about an hour. We were told then the chief would come out and talk to us. He didn't. He was behind the counter talking to us via cell phone. I was trying to ask him questions. But take a look. He wouldn't answer any single question I gave him.


GRIFFIN: Are you concerned at all that members of your department may have helped cover this thing up?


GRIFFIN: Again no answer from the current police chief, from the former police chief. This is all because, as we reported last night, Penn State has an exemption. They don't have to tell us a thing -- Anderson.

COOPER: Right. An exemption that they lobbied for at the state. There were other agencies involved here, including the Pennsylvania Department of Child Welfare. Is there no one talking there either?

GRIFFIN: Yes. We've tried to track down all these various people. The investigator in 1998, a guy named Jerry Lauro. He was working for Protective Services. He did reach out to me and this is what he said in a text message, Anderson.

"I am sorry I cannot say anymore as I am bound by confidentiality. Good luck with your investigation." And then this, "Please do not contact me again."

I should also mention, Anderson, we tried to track down the former university president. He still lives in the president's mansion here at the university, private road, private residence. We've left two messages. We've asked the university why he still lives here. We just are not getting any answers.

COOPER: Well, Drew, keep at it. Appreciate it. Thanks very much, Drew.

Now victim 1's story, you know, I do think it's important in all the coverage of this not to lose sight of the victims here, the alleged victims, the people that we know about, stories that more people may be coming forward.

But as of now, eight victims, alleged victims, identified by the grand jury report. Victim number 1 was 11 or 12 when he met Jerry Sandusky, may have been 10, through the Second Mile Program.

According to the grand jury, Sandusky took the boy to pro college sport events, gave him gifts including golf clubs, a computer. Invited him to his house for sleepovers. That's when the grand jury report details the alleged abuse, Sandusky getting into bed with the boy, saying he was going to crack his back and then fondling him, eventually having oral sex with him numerous times.

There were other alleged incidents at the high school where so- called victim 1 was a freshman and Sandusky volunteered on the football coaching staff. So he was volunteering on the coaching staff of this young man's high school or middle school.

I spoke with the young man's mom a short time ago. We've altered her voice because, as we mentioned at the top, both she and her son said they're living in fear.

How are you? How is your son doing?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Well, we're doing OK. I mean I guess , as well as can be expected. I don't know.

COOPER: I understand your son heard Jerry Sandusky's interview on NBC on Monday night. What was his reaction?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: He was upset. He was very upset about it. He said -- I didn't watch it at the time. I watched it when it was on, and he watched it after that. He said that -- he cried and I said, why are you crying? He said, because I'm afraid he might go free.

COOPER: He's afraid that Sandusky might go free.


COOPER: What was your reaction to it?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I thought it made him look worse. COOPER: Does it make any sense to you at all when he says that he -- you know, was showering naked with boys, that he was -- it was just horseplay?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: No. No. I don't think -- I don't think that showering naked with any little boy would be horseplay.

COOPER: I've read the grand jury testimony about what your son has said -- testified happened. I mean assuming it's all true, he's really a hero because had he not come forward and broken the silence, we wouldn't know about all these other alleged victims.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Oh, he definitely is a hero. He definitely is. He's a brave kid and he really, really -- you know for a long time we thought -- he thought that he was the only one, you know? He thought that we were basically just on our own. And then as we -- as more victims came out, and you know he started feeling a little bit better about that. But, you know, it's been --

COOPER: Explain -- I just want to play one of the things that Sandusky said and get your reaction to it.


BOB COSTAS, NBC NEWS: Are you a pedophile?


COSTAS: Are you sexually attracted to young boys, to underage boys?

SANDUSKY: Am I sexually attracted to underage boys?


SANDUSKY: Sexually attracted -- you know, I enjoy young people. I love to be around them. I -- I -- but no, I'm not sexually attracted to young boys.


COOPER: The answer to that question has raised a lot of eyebrows, just the way he answered it. What did you think of that?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I think that -- I don't know -- I don't exactly know what to think about that other than -- I mean, it seems to me that that's -- he's a sick individual. He's sick. He can't even -- I see it as him not even be able to straightforward answer the question.

COOPER: You think the straightforward answer would just be to say, no, no, no, I'm not attracted to young boys, but he didn't do that?


COOPER: When did you start to realize something was troubling your son?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Well, I guess it was the long haul of clues his behavior. He went from, like, being a (INAUDIBLE), you know, 1-2- 3 magic child to being ornery and being arrogant and mean and we had a lot of different -- you know we started having disagreements. Several times I asked the school to -- you know, talk to him, and they had said, oh, he's just -- there's no man in my house. He's just trying to stake his place in the world.

He's just -- that's what teenagers do. But when he started withdrawing from Jerry -- he started asking me to lie to him when he called the house (INAUDIBLE).

COOPER: So when Sandusky, after a while, he didn't want to -- he didn't want to see Sandusky anymore and Sandusky would call, he would say -- he would ask you to lie, he would ask you to say he wasn't around?


COOPER: And that started -- that made you suspicious?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes, very suspicious. And then out of the blue one day he was sitting at the computer and wanted to look at sex weirdoes.

COOPER: He wanted to do a search about sex offenders or sex weirdoes, that's what he call him?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes. Yes. Yes. He asked me what's the Web site you'd be on to look them up. And I told him it was Megan's Law and -- he said well, how do I type it in? So I gave him the Web address. He typed it in the computer, I said, who are you looking for? He said Jerry.

I kind of just like -- I don't know, I kind of froze, like, wow, what are you looking him up for? And he's, like, I don't know, I just want to see if he was on there. I said, why would he be on there? I said, do you have something to tell me? No. (INAUDIBLE) what is going on? And he said that -- he said, I don't know, sometimes he just acts weird so I just wanted to see if he was on it. That's all. Let's just let it die. I'm (INAUDIBLE). And that was the end of that conversation.

COOPER: So he actually wanted to search under Jerry Sandusky's name on a site for sexual offenders.



UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I thought -- yes, so that was like a big, big clue to me.

COOPER: We're going to have more of my conversation after the break including the lengths that she says Sandusky went to to try to have access to her son.


UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I never gave my permission for him to take my son out of class or to leave the school with my child, but he did.


COOPER: Let us know what you think. We're on Facebook, Google Plus as well. Add us to your circle or follow me on Twitter at Anderson Cooper. I'll be tweeting tonight.

Later our legal panel weighs in on Mike McQueary's credibility as a witness, Joe Paterno's story that he knew nothing about Jerry Sandusky's alleged transgressions until 2002. And a lot more.

Also John Walsh of "America's Most Wanted" joins us.

Also a suspect in custody. Kids are opening fire on the White House. We'll have the latest on what we know about this man, details ahead.


COOPER: Before the break you heard from the mother of one of Jerry Sandusky's alleged victims called Victim 1 in the grand jury report. She talked about how she says her son first broached the possibility that something was very wrong and that Sandusky was not what he seemed to be. Now her antenna was up, but as you'll hear her say, nothing could prepare her or her son for what was yet to come.


COOPER: Jerry was also volunteering at your son's school helping coach the football team.


COOPER: So he -- and he had a lot of privileges at the school so he could call students actually out of class?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I guess. I really think that without parental consent he shouldn't be able to do that. But I never gave my permission for him to take my son out of class or to leave the school with him. But he did.

COOPER: And how soon after your son said that he wanted to search for Jerry's name on a sex offender list? How soon then did the story come out finally?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I would say within a few days after that.

COOPER: Do you know what Jerry was doing when with he called your son out of class?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I have no idea. COOPER: But he would meet with him?


COOPER: And when finally, how did you learn what had happened?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: The school -- I called the school and I had brought to their attention about Jerry, you know, calling him out of class and things like that, and the school was -- they said, oh, well, you know, it's not uncommon for him to do that. And I said, OK, well, let's just look at this from an educational standpoint.

Because I had already talked to him prior and told them that I had a suspicion of something but I didn't -- I didn't want to accuse anybody of anything. But I just -- something was off. And I said, you know, and I told her, I said I'm not going to accuse him of that because, you know, I just -- what I want you to do is I want him to stop taking him out of class, number one.

Number two, I want you to pull him down to the office and just ask him how he feels. And that's what I told them to do.

COOPER: And what happened when they did that?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Well, when they did, the principal had called me in tears and she was crying, I could tell she was crying, and told me to get to the school right away. So I went to the school and met with the guidance counselor and the principal. And when I did they told me that my son had said some things about -- that there was a problem with Jerry and he didn't know -- he didn't really admit anything at that point that was -- he just said he thought he needed to tell somebody or it would get worse.

COOPER: That's a really brave thing for him to have said.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: And then -- yes, it is. And then -- and then the principal said, oh, you know, Jerry has a heart of gold.

COOPER: The principal said that to you, that Jerry has a heart of gold?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: Yes. Yes. And that -- and I said, listen -- I was very upset, this (INAUDIBLE) e-mail, I was extremely upset and I was basically yelling at them that they needed to call the police. I said this -- I said, I want you to call the police, I called for you, you know. I said call the police right now and I said it like three times, call the police right now. And they said no. You need to think about -- they said I needed to think about the ramifications of what would happen if I did that.

COOPER: What do you think they meant by that?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I don't know. I guess -- I'm assuming what we're going through now. I don't really know.

COOPER: What do you want to see happen to Jerry Sandusky? UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I want Jerry Sandusky to go to jail for the rest of his life.

COOPER: Would that be justice?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: I don't even know, to tell you the truth. At this point I don't even know.

COOPER: I'm glad you were willing to talk and to tell us what you've been through and your son as well. Thank you.



COOPER: Well, late this evening we got a response from the alleged victim's school system, the district's lawyer David Lindsay saying he doesn't have time to respond to specific allegations but he did send the following statement, quote, "Due to the ongoing nature of the investigation and prosecution of Jerry Sandusky, it would be inappropriate for the Keystone Central School District to provide any comment in this regard at this time."

The statement continues, "Nonetheless, the Keystone Central School District has been and will continue to be fully cooperative with authorities in this matter."

Let's bring in our legal panel, senior legal analyst, Jeffrey Toobin, defense attorney Mark Geragos, and former prosecutor Sunny Hostin, legal contributor for "In Session" on truTV.

So, Jeff, talking to this alleged victim's mom, I mean couldn't help but wonder if her son had never come forward, these allegations against Sandusky could still be under wraps.

JEFFREY TOOBIN, CNN SENIOR LEGAL ANALYST: I mean it is just so astonishing how many people knew some piece of this story and yet it was only 11 days ago that he was arrested. I mean, the years that have passed since 1998 and, as you have pointed out, the number of children who apparently have been abused since 1998, it just makes you crazy to think about it.

COOPER: Mark, I've enjoyed having you on the program the last couple of nights from -- because you keep -- you know, from a defense lawyer standpoint, you keep raising very good points, you bring up the McMartin preschool and the rush to judgment back then. The mother also said that hearing Sandusky's interview on NBC News made her and made her son more determined than ever to testify against him.

Do you think that interview has already kind of backfired on the defense?

MARK GERAGOS, CRIMINAL DEFENSE ATTORNEY: Well, the interview with him I think was not helpful. We said that the other day. The question that I have is, there's two other stories. I know that it doesn't pertain directly to the interview you just had, but my understanding is that the attorney general has now filed something saying they're not ready to proceed on the preliminary hearing against the school president, which I find to be fascinating to me, why is it that if the AG was in such a hurry to prosecute this thing that they're not ready to proceed?

And I have -- you know, other questions as to why it is at this point that people are saying this happened, that happened, I listened to that interview, and he was saying -- the mother was saying that I was going to -- I begged them to call the police. Well, why didn't the parents call the police?

I'm -- as perplexed as everybody else, but for a lot of other different reasons, you know? There is a phenomena of piling on at a certain point. I don't know, you don't know, none of us know what the real truth is here. But there's a lot of things that strike me as very peculiar.

COOPER: She said she actually -- when the principal wouldn't call the police, that she took her child and they immediately went to Child Welfare and that's how the police were finally involved.

To hear, Sunny, this mom claim that she was basically being pressured not to go to the police or at least to consider that Jerry Sandusky has a heart of gold by a school official is pretty surprising.

SUNNY HOSTIN, LEGAL CONTRIBUTOR, "IN SESSION" ON TRUTV: You know, it's not surprising to me because, again, child sex crimes are always shrouded in the secrecy. People don't want to touch it, they don't want to talk about it, and they start thinking about themselves and their personal exposure, the exposure of the school, because they let Jerry Sandusky take this child out.

All sorts of things come into play instead of what is best for the children, what is best for the victims. So actually I'm not surprised that the mother was -- you know, pressured. I'm not surprised that she didn't immediately call the police because people don't want to believe these things happen. But they happen all the time. They happen every day. They happen every hour to a child in our country.

And I know this and you know this, Anderson, because I spent a lot of my career prosecuting these kind of cases. So unfortunately I'm not surprised at all that this is what's happened.

GERAGOS: Well, then how do you -- how do you explain that supposedly she said, call the police, screaming at them three times, and then she didn't call the police? Or the father didn't call the police? I mean, something --

COOPER: Well, no, what she did --


GERAGOS: Just doesn't make a whole lot of --

COOPER: She's saying what she did --

GERAGOS: Doesn't make a whole lot of sense.

COOPER: And she said to her child -- she said to her child right then, grab your backpack, we're leaving, and literally she didn't even drive home. She drove straight off to Child Welfare and actually a Child Welfare officer met her at her house.

GERAGOS: Why didn't -- right. Why didn't she call 911? Why didn't she call the police? Why was she screaming at somebody else to call the police? If she was that concerned in real time --

TOOBIN: Mark, that's not fair.

HOSTIN: That isn't fair.

GERAGOS: Why weren't the police called?



GERAGOS: Well -- you know, you could say it's not fair. There's been nothing fair about what's the coverage of this case. Nothing's fair about it.

TOOBIN: No, but -- I mean she went to Child Welfare. I don't think that's significantly different from going to --

HOSTIN: Exactly.

TOOBIN: Going to the police. If I could just raise another thing that I think is really significant today --

GERAGOS: She didn't scream, go to Child Welfare, go to Child Welfare.

COOPER: Yes, go ahead.

TOOBIN: Can I just raise one more thing that I think is very significant today? McQueary's e-mail saying, in fact, he did go to the police, I think this is a classic example of why prosecutors tell their witnesses, don't talk about the case, don't give interviews. It's frustrating to us. He is generating material for him to be cross-examined at trial.

GERAGOS: Exactly.

TOOBIN: He appears now to have told contradictory stories.


HOSTIN: Well --

TOOBIN: That I think --


COOPER: That is just a big problem.

GERAGOS: Jeff, that was the other story that was out today. It's a huge problem that you've got the person who supposedly is the eyewitness, they don't have --

TOOBIN: Right.

HOSTIN: It's not necessarily contradictory.

GERAGOS: Well, it's contradictory when they interviewed the police today and the police say he never contacted us. That's not contradictory?

HOSTIN: No. Perhaps, Mark, it's possible, that because there's been such a cover-up no report was filed, no report was taken. But in terms of this grand jury presentment --

GERAGOS: Right. Three police departments decided to deep-six the report.

HOSTIN: There's no transcripts out there. There's no transcripts for the grand jury yet because of course grand jury proceedings are secret. All we have is this presentment, which is basically a summary or report. So it's quite possible that in front of the grand jury he did discuss his police encounter.

COOPER: OK, we've got -- I'm sorry, we've got to go.

Jeff Toobin, thanks. Sunny Hostin, Mark Geragos.

Up next, John Walsh on how pedophiles think.


JACK WALSH, "AMERICA'S MOST WANTED": They never have any remorse. They're great liars. They work themselves into society. Lots of them are respected and admired by the people in that society. But they're still pedophiles and it's a compulsion.


COOPER: Also ahead tonight, Newt Gingrich on the defense -- on the defense about his former relationship with mortgage giant Freddie Mac. He criticized Democrats from taking money from the company. Freddie Mac paid him close to $2 million.

We have the "Raw Politics" ahead.


COOPER: A new clip tonight from that stunning interview Jerry Sandusky did with NBC's Bob Costas. When Sandusky made the surprising decision to speak out about the charges against him and when his lawyer made the decision to let him to, a window opened. Ever since people have been asking, is it a window into the mind of a wrongly accused man or a monster? First, and you heard just the break, the moment that raised the moment eyebrows --


UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Are you a pedophile?

JERRY SANDUSKY (via telephone): No.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Are you sexually attracted to young boys, underage boys?

SANDUSKY: Am I sexually attracted to underage boys?


SANDUSKY: Sexually attracted? I enjoy young people. I love to be around them. I -- but, no, I'm not sexually attracted to young boys.


COOPER: Well, that's the clip you're familiar with, the rambling answer that got people talking. Now there's more to talk about. Here's the new clip from the NBC interview Bob Costas asked Jerry Sandusky, did he think his behavior fit the classic pattern of a pedophile? Here's his response.


SANDUSKY: I didn't go around seeking out every young person for sexual needs that I've helped. There are many that I didn't have hardly any contact with who I have helped in many, many ways.


COOPER: Joining us now is John Walsh who's seen his share of predators and people falsely accused at the same time. He's the host of "America's Most Wanted." Now on its new home on Lifetime starting December 2nd.

John, we just heard this new clip that NBC had released of Sandusky saying there are many young people he helped that he hardly had any contact with. He says many, not all. What do you make of that?

JOHN WALSH, HOST, "AMERICA'S MOST WANTED" ON LIFETIME: I think it's appalling actually. I mean, the charity, Second Mile, has done some really wonderful work, but it was his private hunting grounds.

I mean, he's the classic pedophile, always in denial, no remorse, don't think they do anything wrong and I've caught so many of them, Anderson.

You and I have talked about them for years. They never have any remorse. They are great liars. They work themselves into society. Lots of them are respected and admired by the people in that society. But they're still pedophiles and it's a compulsion.

COOPER: Did it raise your eyebrows when you heard him answer, you know, when Costas asked him if he was sexually attracted to young boys. I mean, I don't like to put myself in someone else's shoes.

But you would think the answer is, no, no, I'm not, being outraged about it. His answer was, I mean, it kind of went meandering until he finally got around to saying no, he's not.

WALSHI: It really is appalling. There's no other word for it. If he was innocent -- and I don't think he is, that's my personal opinion. And because we live in this politically correct society we have to say he an alleged pedophile, which he is.

But if he was innocent, the first thing he would say is, this is outrageous. I love and respect young boys and I work with them. First thing he should have said was no, but that's the classic pedophile, Anderson.

COOPER: It does seem like, you know, and I've done interviews with pedophiles and shows about them. There are the ones who grab kids off the street. So we hear about the most in the headlines.

But it's the ones who are groomers, who look for a family where maybe there's not a dad around or a mom in need or a child lonely or on his own a lot.

Explain what parents should be looking out for. I mean, because we all know about the people who grab kids into cars, but the people insinuate people themselves into their children's lives over time, that seems when we often don't hear about.

WALSH: Well, statistics have proven out over the years that the vast majority of children, at least 80 percent of them, are molested by a trusted authority figure or somebody they know or a relative.

And what's really appalling is that this guy was on the radar for 15 years, reports were made to the charity that he founded. There were reports made to Penn State. That's also appalling, that he was allowed to continue. It's all so appalling.

COOPER: I just talked to the mother of victim number one and she was saying that when finally her son started telling school officials and she was called in and the son began to indicate there was a problem with Sandusky according to him.

One of the -- the principal said to her, you know, you need to think about what you want to do because he's got a heart of gold, talking about Jerry Sandusky.

Often it seems like -- do you think because of his reputation, his standing in the community, that people may have looked the other way or ignored instincts they had? WALSH: Without a doubt. They're great at isolating themselves with the children and this guy was so respected by so many people in the community. I think they were all in denial, Anderson. I always say that -- that mother was right because boys don't tell until later.

They're embarrassed. They feel thieve lost their self-esteem. They feel there's no one they can trust and tell. I really believe that there's a big, huge cover-up here because there were lots of incidents, lots of reports, and this guy was on the radar for 15 years.

COOPER: Do reporting laws need to change?

WALSH: Absolutely. Absolutely, Anderson. First of all, in three states it's a felony if you don't report it. It's a misdemeanor in every state. It should have been reported. That coach who saw it in that locker room, Anderson, here is a great big tall guy, 6'4", choking and sodomizing a boy.

Should have been stopped there, the cops should have been brought in that night and this university should never have let this guy retire and still bring boys into the locker room at 9:30 at night. It's just appalling.

COOPER: John Walsh, appreciate you coming on. Thank you, John.

WALSH: Thank you, Anderson.

COOPER: One final note, throughout the evening we've been using the name victim one, which is how he's referred to in the grand jury report. Obviously, he's an alleged victim until and unless Jerry Sandusky is convicted of a crime.

Still ahead, a major break in the White House shooting investigation. A 21-year-old man in custody tonight, more about him and how close the bullets he allegedly fired came to the first family.

Also, tonight, "Raw Politics." New reporting on how much money Newt Gingrich was actually paid by Freddie Mac and what he was hired to do.


COOPER: In "Raw Politics" tonight, new questions about Newt Gingrich's ties to Freddie Mac. On the campaign trail in Iowa today, the Republican presidential candidate was asked repeatedly about the work his consulting firm did for the mortgage financing giant over a period of about eight years.


NEWT GINGRICH (R), PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I was approached for strategic advice. I was glad to offer strategic advice. We did it for a number of companies and the Gingrich Group was very successful.

(END VIDEO CLIP) COOPER: Well, the Gingrich Group is the consulting firm the former speaker founded after leaving Congress in 1998. CNN has confirmed that between '99 and 2008, Freddie Mac paid the firm between $1.6 million and $1.8 million for two separate consulting stints.

It's a lot more than Gingrich has acknowledged. Now during a debate last week, he said his firm was paid $300,000. This is the same Freddie Mac whose risky lending practices contributed to the 2008 financial crisis.

The same Freddie Mac that Gingrich has turned into a punching bag in the current presidential campaign. The same Freddie Mac he's railed against ever since his consulting contract ended.


GINGRICH: I'm very saddened that John McCain hasn't had the nerve and the coherence to go nose to nose with Obama and force Obama to give back the money he's taken from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, forced him to -- who after all got $90 million in six years while totally mismanaging Fannie Mae.


COOPER: That was Gingrich in 2008, clearly implying that Freddie Mac's money is tainted. What he didn't mention in that interview is that the Gingrich group was paid handsomely by Freddie Mac during the years leading up to the crisis.

So what exactly was the firm being paid to do? Gingrich first told reporters that Freddie Mac hired him as a historian. CNN has talked to four people who worked at Freddie Mac at the same time Gingrich who told us that's not accurate.

One told us that Gingrich was paid to help Freddie Mac with its political strategy emphasis on political. Gingrich now says he was a strategic adviser. He denies he ever lobbied for Freddie Mac.

We asked Freddie Mac. They told us Gingrich was a consultant and didn't lobby for them. It's a fact that Gingrich was never a registered lobbyist.

But many of his critics and his opponents say that's a matter of semantics. Gingrich has said he'll make his Freddie Mac records public to the extent that he can.

Instead late today his campaign released a list of they called a fact sheet about Gingrich's ties to Freddie Mac. They said that's all they'll be releasing.

Let's talk about it now with political contributors, Ari Fleischer and Hilary Rosen, who both worked as lobbyists themselves. No, you haven't?


COOPER: How big a problem is this for Newt Gingrich?

FLEISCHER: Anderson, I think this is neither a tempest nor a teapot. I think there's any number of people who have worked for these companies and gave strategic advice to them, which is what Newt acknowledged he did.

He said he didn't lobby for them. I think it's problematic the 2008 interview where he said President Obama should return the money. Obviously, that's a little inconsistent with him keeping the money.

But you know, on the day that the debt topped $15 trillion, who Newt Gingrich worked for I don't really think is a significant issue in the debate. There are a lot bigger issues this country is wrestling with.

COOPER: Hilary, I mean, there's nothing wrong with lobbying if that's what Gingrich was in fact doing. Do you think this a big deal?

HILARY ROSEN, CNN POLITICAL CONTRIBUTOR: Of course, it is a big deal because it just piles on top of, you know, year after year of Newt Gingrich's sort of saying one thing and doing another. And this just proves it.

You know, for two years he made it his number one priority to trash President Obama and Barney Frank and other Democrats for their handling of Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae. And here at the same time he was taking money from them.

You know, this is the same guy basically who said he cheated on his wives out of a huge amount of patriotism. This guy is just completely not credible. But, you know, the big picture here is really that the Republicans are so desperate to find an alternative to Mitt Romney that Newt Gingrich, despite all of this, keeps rising in the polls.

Herman Cain actually hasn't sort of fallen off the radar screen yet. And this is all because of Mitt Romney really, that he's just not a good enough candidate for them.

And, you know, that's why Ari is sitting here today saying, maybe this is really a fine thing for Newt Gingrich to be doing, to be lying about how much he's taken money and the like. It's because they just don't want Mitt Romney.

FLEISCHER: I love to hear that because, if Mitt Romney has all of those problems, why is he beating Barack Obama in all of the polls.

ROSEN: He's not.

FLEISCHER: Frankly, back on the substance of the question that you asked me, Anderson and that you asked Hilary, I think it's far worse that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac have taken so many trillions of dollars that in effect was taxpayer money, taxpayer guaranteed money and squandered it on giving loans to people who had no means of paying back the loans. That in many ways is what triggered the 2008 financial crisis and has not been addressed by President Obama in any shape, way or form. Whatever little millions Newt took dwarfs the damage those institutions have done.

Now the right question is, what reforms are necessary to fix Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. At least Newt is on the right side with those issues. Now he's seeking reforms. That's the bigger picture. That is a more healthy thing for the country's economy.

ROSEN: Those institutions actually weren't fixed under Ari's former boss, George Bush and when Barack Obama came to office he and the Democratic Congress actually did pass new laws that reined them in and considerably changed the way they do business.

I don't know what Ari is talking about. But the real issue for Newt Gingrich I think is that, can he credibly go on week after week and change his story every day?

Today it was I'm going to release the contracts, then tonight it's no, I'm not going to release the contracts. Last week, it was I was for a single payer. Then it's we shouldn't have single payer.

We've got to repeal Obama care. I mean, Newt Gingrich is just not a credible candidate. As smart as he is, he's almost too clever by half.


FLEISCHER: On the issue of President Bush, President Bush repeatedly pressed for reform. It was blocked actually by Barney Frank and by former Senator Chris Dodd. So that's why it didn't get done.

But there's another issue about Newt and that's something that's going to be debated throughout this campaign. There is the sharp Newt and then there's a bombastic Newt. We'll still see which one comes out in the course of this election. That still is an open issue.

COOPER: Ari, Hilary Rosen, appreciate you being on. Thank you.

Coming, a man arrested in connection with Friday shooting at the White House. We're going to tell you what led to his arrest and where the bullets were found at the White House. That's next.


COOPER: We're following a number of other stories tonight. Susan Hendricks has the "360 News and Business Bulletin" -- Susan.

SUSAN HENDRICKS, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Anderson, a man has been arrested in Pennsylvania in connection with a shooting incident at the White House. It happened Friday night.

Oscar Ramiro Ortega Hernandez is scheduled to appear in court tomorrow. Two bullets were found at the White House. One was stopped by a bulletproof glass in a window. The other was found on the White House exterior, outside the White House. A law enforcement source says a weapon registered to the suspect was found in a car nearby.

Energy Secretary Steven Chu is set to appear tomorrow at the White House Committee hearing looking into a federal loan guarantee for the solar power company.

Text of his opening statement shows that he will say the Energy Department's decision to give to give that company $535 million in federal loan guarantees was not influenced by any political favoritism.

House Republicans have claimed the Solyndra benefited from political ties between President Obama and George Kaiser, a major Solyndra investor. The company went bankrupt this year.

How about this? Stocks took a dive in late trading today, the Dow sank 191 points. The S&P lost 21 points.

And the story of 110-carat yellow diamond reportedly sold for more than $12 million in auction. It was found in South Africa and it's the eighth highest price ever paid for a diamond.

COOPER: There you go. Pretty.

Coming up, Susan, thanks. Rebecca Black is back. We just could not wait until Friday to put her critics on "The Ridiculist."


COOPER: Time now for "The Ridiculist." Tonight, we're adding all of Rebecca Black's critics. That's right. You know who you are. Those rare individuals who don't live their whole lives online and instead do things like read books or go outdoors, also for our executive producer who just today dared to ask, who is Rebecca Black?

A little refresher. That was Rebecca Black's song "Friday," which burst into our consciousness eight months ago. It's not just about "Friday" though. The lyrics help point out, which days of the week come directly before and after Friday. There's also a section about the decision making process involving deciding whether to sit in the front or the back seat of a car.

It's a fun, fun, fun, fun, fun little song, and, yes, now it will be in my head for the rest of night. Anyway, the internet nearly imploded after then-13-year-old Rebecca Black came out with that song. Millions upon millions of people watched the video. There were a ton of parodies videos online and late-night talk shows made fun of them.

A lot of people call it the worst song in the history of music, which is ridiculous because that honor according to multiple sources belongs to "We Built This City on Rock N Roll" song by Starship.

Rebecca Black was largely seen as one hit wonder to the tune of I wonder how this horrible song ever saw the light of day, but guess what, critics. Rebecca Black is back. That's right. She has a brand new song called "Person of Interest." Here is a taste of the new video.

Crime scene on the dance floor. Police tape on the front door. You are a person of interest. Make no mistake. Rebecca Black has matured as an artist. I'm guessing all the people who blasted her for "Friday" are eating their words right now.

So they should. So you should. The reaction to "Friday" was outrageous. People wrote horrible things online about Rebecca. She even got death threats, which police took seriously enough to investigate. Much to her credit, Rebecca took it all in stride. She posted this video about what her summer was like.


REBECCA BLACK: Over the summer, I got to do some amazing things I never thought would happen. I got to join Katy Perry on stage and sing "Friday" with her. I got to attend the "Glee" premiere and I also won a teen choice award.


COOPER: That's right. How did you spend your summer, haters? Besides anonymously posting mean things about a young girl singing a song, I mean. Rebecca black, good for you. Congratulations on your success and your new song, and all you critics, just try to lighten up and let's all keep partying, partying, yes, on "The Ridiculist."