Story highlights

The Trump administration might be moving slower than others, but the pace of filling ambassadorships is generally tedious and time-consuming

The confirmation process has bedeviled all modern presidents, including Trump's recent predecessors

Washington CNN  — 

The slow pace of nominations in Rex Tillerson’s State Department is making what a typically a chaotic transition process even more drawn out.

As the Trump administration works to fill nearly 100 senior State Department positions that need Senate confirmation, including over 60 ambassadorships, officials are confronting the enormity of that challenge and navigating a sea of red tape to ensure their policies are well-represented abroad.

Confirming a US ambassador has never been easy, and the Trump administration might be moving slower than others – but the pace is generally a tedious and time-consuming one.

Regardless of who’s running the State Department, to become an ambassador requires expertise, connections, patience and a willingness to wade through “half a truckload of paper,” according to one who knows.

Ronald Neumann, now president of the American Academy of Diplomacy, who went through the nominating process three times for ambassadorial posts.

The former Foreign Service officer said the length of the process can vary tremendously, and is especially challenging in the first year of a new administration.

RELATED: State of play: Open jobs, uncertainty for diplomatic corps

“If the decision is made by the State Department, in coordination with the White House, to nominate you for an ambassadorship, the next thing that happens is you get about a half a truckload of paper,” he noted.

That goes for both career State Department officials elevated to ambassadorships and political appointees chosen for their resumes or connections to the White House.

There are financial disclosure forms, questionnaires from senators, background documents, security forms and more.

“It’s a lot of paper,” said Neumann. “It’s not something you do for fun.”

Government lawyers then pour over the paperwork, which can be a time-consuming process for candidates with complicated business interests and investments or extensive foreign ties.

If the White House decides to move forward with a nomination after the rigorous review, they turn to the government of the host country for approval – a process called “agrément.”

If the foreign government objects to a potential nominee – which is rare – the process ends then and there.

“At this point, nothing has normally been made public,” said Neumann. “All that gets done, and then they do the official nomination process, and then you start waiting for a senate confirmation.”

First, the nominee has a hearing in the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. If the committee members approve of the nomination, it goes to the full Senate for a vote. And because of Senate rules, any senator can hold up any nomination for any reason.

“I was nominated twice (as ambassador to) Bahrain because the first time was in the end of the Clinton administration, and they didn’t get around to (holding a) hearing (for) me for various reasons and the nomination expired” when Clinton left office, he recounted. “So I had to wait to be re-nominated by the Bush administration.”

“For several months nothing happened,” he said. But that all changed on September 11, 2001, when the al Qaeda terror attacks put a spotlight on US policy in the Middle East.

“I got a call at noon that my hearing was at 5:30, and by 6:30 I was voted out of the committee, and I was voted off the floor the next day,” he said. “So (the process) can be very slow and then all of a sudden jerk into high gear.”